In the early hours of August 5, 2000, a gruesome murder unfolded in Berks County, Pennsylvania, a quiet community unaccustomed to such brutality. Chester Leroy Spayd III, driven by long-standing animosities and drug-fueled rage, murdered Kenneth Long, his mother’s boyfriend. This case would soon reveal not only Chester’s descent into addiction and violence but also his mother’s alleged complicity in the crime.
Chester Leroy Spayd III grew up in Pennsylvania and spent most of his life in Berks County. By adulthood, his life had been consumed by substance abuse, with a particular addiction to crack cocaine and alcohol. Family members described Chester as
“almost continuously under the influence of beer and crack cocaine,”
and his behavior became increasingly erratic, especially when around Kenneth Long, his mother’s boyfriend.
LISTEN TO THE ENTIRE CASE AND MY THOUGHTS
************************************************************************************************
Support these businesses; support LaM:
BJs – Save $35 on a yearly membership with my link: http://www.murderandlove.com/BJs
NOVEMBER PATREON SALE – Save 50% all bonuses – Use the NOVEMBER SALE tier until 11-30-2024
✨✨For a commercial-free episode, pictures, and more head to our exclusive group at http://www.patreon.com/loveandmurder✨✨
Podcast Promo: Darkcast Network http://www.darkcastnetwork.com
*************************************************************************************************
The strained relationship between Chester and Kenneth simmered for years, and it was well-known among friends and family. His struggles with addiction compounded these conflicts, making Chester prone to outbursts and erratic behavior.
In the days before the murder, Chester reportedly spent time with friends drinking and using drugs, growing agitated and unstable as the day progressed. Witnesses testified that on the evening of August 4, 2000, Chester discussed his frustrations with an acquaintance, venting about his issues with Kenneth. Witnesses, at the time, dismissed these comments as merely the words of an intoxicated man.
In the early hours of August 5, 2000, Chester confronted Kenneth. During a heated argument, Chester got an axe that in in the home and attacked Kenneth from behind. Forensic reports revealed that Kenneth was struck three times in the back of the head with the axe, which caused severe trauma and led to his immediate death.
After killing Kenneth, Chester needed to hide his crime and he enlisted a friend to help move Kenneth’s body. Together, they transported Kenneth’s remains to a remote location, where they left the body with minimal effort to cover their tracks.
Just hours after the murder, Chester’s mother, Phyllis, placed a 911 call to report Kenneth missing. Police initially approached the case as a missing person’s investigation, but as they conducted interviews and examined the scene, they changed their minds.
Investigators found clear evidence of a violent altercation; blood stains and other signs, and detectives began focusing their attention on Chester. His erratic behavior, combined with his dislike of Kenneth, made him a primary suspect.
On August 7, 2000 police brought Chester in for questioning. Chester denied involvement, but his story soon began to unravel. Eventually, he confessed, admitting to attacking Kenneth with the axe and disposing of the body.
In his confession, Chester reportedly said, “I did it because I just couldn’t stand him anymore. He was always there, always in the way.”
Chester was arrested and charged with multiple offenses, including criminal homicide, first-degree murder, aggravated assault, possession of an instrument of crime, abuse of a corpse, and recklessly endangering another person. He pleaded not guilty.
Chester’s trial started in early 2002, nearly two years after the murder. The prosecution’s case was built on Chester’s confession, forensic evidence, and witness testimony describing his behavior. Prosecutors argued that Chester’s actions were premeditated.
In their defense, Chester’s legal team argued that his actions were the result of a “drug-fueled psychosis,” claiming he was not in control of his actions. His attorney contended that Chester’s addiction and strained relationship with Kenneth made for a volatile environment. Despite these arguments, the jury was ultimately unmoved and found him guilty.
On September 19, 2002, prosecutors added a charge of criminal conspiracy to commit third-degree murder. That same day, Chester pleaded guilty to third-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and abuse of a corpse. As part of a plea, Chester agreed to testify against his mother who he claimed was the “mastermind of the murder.”
Spayd allegedly stated, “She knew what I was going to do, but she didn’t stop me.”
He claimed that his mother even took money from Kenneth’s pants pocket after he was dead, keeping some for herself and giving $100 to him. As they disposed of the body, Phyllis acted as a lookout.
Support LaM and get bonuses using the November Half Off sale. Get all of LaMs bonues for only $5/mo! Join now —> here
On October 23, Chester was sentenced to 20 to 40 years for third-degree murder, 10 to 20 years for conspiracy, and an additional 3 to 24 months for abuse of a corpse, totaling 30 to 60 years. In issuing the sentence, the judge said,
“The violence of this act, particularly in the context of family, is something that this court finds deeply disturbing.”
Following his conviction, Chester filed several appeals, arguing that his sentence was excessive and failed to account for his impaired state at the time of the crime. His appeals included:
- Direct Appeal (2002): Filed on December 6, 2002, challenging the severity of his sentence. It was denied on August 12, 2003.
- First Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) Petition (2004): Filed on September 15, 2004, contesting the sentence’s fairness. This petition was dismissed on February 22, 2005.
- Second PCRA Petition (2006): Filed on June 20, 2006, alleging ineffective counsel. The court dismissed this petition on August 9, 2006, a decision later upheld by the Pennsylvania Superior Court on August 6, 2007, with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court denying further review on November 29, 2007.
- Federal Habeas Corpus Petition (2007): Filed on December 17, 2007, repeating claims of ineffective assistance and newly discovered evidence. The court dismissed this petition on June 4, 2008, citing it as filed beyond the statute of limitations.
“The calculated nature of Mr. Spayd’s actions, combined with his failure to show genuine remorse, does not support a reduction in sentence.”
Kenneth Long’s family later released a statement through his sister, saying,
“We may never understand why this happened, but we know Kenny deserved better. He was a good man, and he didn’t deserve to die like this.”
Past Cases Mentioned in this Episode:
Love, Lies, and Poisonous Murder | The Case of “The Black Widow” Dena Thompson
https://murderandlove.com/love-lies-and-poisonous-murder-the-case-of-the-black-widow-dena-thompson/
If you enjoyed this episode,subscribe to our podcast. Tune in every week for new episodes. Share it with your loved ones and spread the word.
And remember, sharing the episode with a friend is a free and easy way to support the show.
Question: Do you think David is guilty?
Catch this case while you’re here:
Florida Doctor Killed Patient by Removing Liver Instead of Spleen | The Case of Thomas Shaknovsky
Dr. Thomas Shaknovsky | Zarzaur LawOn August 21, 2024, 70-year-old William Bryan, an Alabama native, tragically died during surgery at Ascension Sacred Heart Emerald Coast Hospital in Florida. What was supposed to be a routine splenectomy to remove his spleen went...
🔗 Get involved in the conversation:
WhatsApp
********************************************
HOW TO SUPPORT LOVE AND MURDER:
🧃Buy me a coffee (or an apple juice)🧃
You can now join Love and Murder’s Supporter’s Club in one of 3 places:
1. Patreon (✨✨best option for more extras✨✨)
2. Spreaker (choose the premium feature)
3. Spotify
********************************************
Rate, Share, Subscribe!🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
Want to hear about a specific true crime case?
Email me at [email protected]
or
Request here: https://forms.gle/K513K8wCdRbU6syz5
Follow on Social Media
Instagram
Aftershow True Crime Community
Unlock Exclusive True Crime Content
Delve deeper into the mysteries with LaM Patreon. Get premium access to additional episodes and exclusive Ky Rants only available here.
True Crime Tuesday: A Case of Mistaken Identity and 17 Years Incarceration – The Case of Richard Jones
Midweek Rant: Tennessee Man Charged with the Brutal Murder of His Wife With a Hammer – Joseph Glynn
In today’s rant, I tell you of a horrible case of a 70 year old man who bludgeoned his wife to death with a hammer, and then tried to get away with it by lying to his kids.
Did he act alone or did he have an accomplice?
Let’s get into the case of…
Oregon Teen Heroically Saved a Baby from Electrocution – Majiah Washington
Get 3 months FREE when you buy any 3-month plan
*Limited time offer, available for new customers only
No Results Found
The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post.
Join my LaM Facebook Fan Group
Find LaM merch in our shop
And an easy and free way to help me out is by simply sharing this blog post.
All Love and No Murder Yall
true crime, gabby petito, brain laundrie, love and murder, love and murder heartbreak to homicide, current news, true crime blog